Pennsylvania’s Most Eligible Attorneys General: Who Will Get the Final Rose?

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

The Keystone State’s in a kerfuffle, and oh, boy, it’s a doozy. Pennsylvania’s gearing up for an electoral smackdown that promises more twists and taradiddles than a pretzel factory with a flair for drama. Yep, we’re talking about the highfalutin race for the attorney general’s post, which is currently rippling through the political pond like a boulder chucked by a giant toddler.

Candidates are strutting their legal mumbo jumbo, sporting credentials that range from impressive to “you’ve got to be kidding me.” It’s a buffet of quasi-legal bravado that would make even the Founding Fathers scratch their powdered wigs in bewilderment.

The Breakdown

  • It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s… Attorney General Man?: Candidates seem to be under the impression that the office of the attorney general comes with a superhero cape and theme music. Their campaign trails might as well be laden with phone booths for quick changes into spandex suits.

    • Each candidate’s debating skills would have you believe they can single-handedly take down corruption, as if it’s a cartoon villain twirling a conspicuously fake mustache.

  • The Name-Dropping Olympics: Every hopeful AG contender is flinging around endorsements like frisbees at a park. If endorsements were currency, these folks would be making it rain so hard we’d need an ark to survive the flood.

    • It’s less about the promises they’re making and more about who thinks they’re the bee’s knees. Spoiler: They all think they’re the bee’s knees.

  • Legal Eagles or Sitting Ducks?: Candidates come locked and loaded with legal cred or, in some cases, are just winging it with confidence that makes you wonder if there’s a sale on chutzpah somewhere.

    • Their CVs are so pumped up, they’re one steroids scandal away from a lifetime ban from professional sports.

  • Let’s Get Ready to Mumble!: Debates are less about coherent policy and more about who can perform the best rendition of Statute Scatting, a fun little ditty where the lyrics are entirely comprised of legal jargon strung together with buzzwords.

    • If you play a drinking game where you take a shot every time they say “constitutionality,” you’ll need a liver transplant by the end of the first debate.

  • The Transparency Conundrum: Each candidate is vowing to be the paragon of transparency, which in political terms means they’ll tell us exactly what they want us to know, and nothing more. Truly, it’s about as clear as a fogged-up bathroom mirror.

    • The irony of promising transparency in a political campaign is akin to an all-you-can-eat buffet promising weight loss.

The Counter

  • Maybe It’s Maybelline, Maybe It’s Credentials: Who needs actual legal experience when you can simply gloss over that tiny detail with a dash of charisma and a well-placed wink?

    • The less you know about their qualifications, the more you can focus on their dazzling smiles and firm handshakes.

  • I Endorse This Message, and So Does My Cat: With the number of endorsements being thrown around, maybe we should start including family pets for that extra dash of wholesomeness.

    • After all, if Mr. Whiskers believes in the candidate, who are we to say no?

  • Fumbling for Justice: Anyone can sound like they know what they’re doing if they talk fast enough and with enough conviction. It worked for the Micro Machines guy, right?

    • Clarity is overrated; let those legalese lullabies rock you to a state of blissful ignorance.

  • The Transparency Two-Step: Perhaps they can introduce a transparency dance, where for every step forward, they slide two steps back. It’ll be the newest craze at political fundraisers.

    • At least when they say “I’m stepping back,” it can be both literal and political.

  • Buzzword Bingo Bonanza: Next debate, hand out bingo cards with buzzwords, and when somebody wins, they get to be AG for a day. It seems like a system as good as any.

    • Education, experience, policy positions – pfft, let’s crown the king or queen of rhetorical razzmatazz!

The Hot Take

In a sweltering hot take that could bake cookies on a car dashboard in February, let’s just say it’s time to switch up the game. How about we setup a little something I like to call “The People’s Legal Gladiator Arena.” You want the job? You’ve got to earn it – not through endorsements and flashy jargon, but through a series of battles where your only weapons are wits, legal knowledge, and a willingness to actually serve the public good.

Last lawyer standing gets the gig, and the losers have to intern for the winner to learn what they missed. And every campaign promise broken? That’s a week volunteering at a legal aid clinic. Let’s see who’s laughing all the way to the courthouse steps then. Accountability with a side of snark: it’s what’s for dinner.

Source: Battle for high-profile attorney general’s post headlines Pennsylvania primaries

Democrawonk was born from the need to counter the Right's mind-boggling acrobatics with a dose of liberal sanity. It's a haven where progressive thoughts roam free, untrampled by the right-wing's love affair with alternative facts. And it's funny.

Other Articles

Leave a Reply