The federal government approved about 55,000 citizenship applications between April and June, down from more than 230,000 during the same period last year, according to USCIS figures reported by Stateline. The agency says it has strengthened screening, English requirements and civics testing.
Immigrant advocates accuse the administration of deliberately extending the process to deny eligible people voting rights. The administration defends the changes as necessary vetting. The numbers establish a sharp slowdown; they do not, by themselves, establish why every application is waiting or how any applicant would vote.
There. The qualifications are in place. We may now examine the fucking door.
For years, American politics has offered immigrants a very stern instruction: use the legal process. Stand in the correct line. Fill out the proper forms. Do it the right way.
Then people use the legal process, and suddenly the line is a national-security habitat that must not be disturbed by movement.
You thought the point of the queue was to reach the counter? Adorable. The queue is where we display our commitment to the counter.
USCIS says its changes include screening social media for “anti-American activities.” Applicants must demonstrate good moral character and attachment to the Constitution.
Good. Fine. An attachment to the Constitution would be a refreshing national trend. Could we perhaps run the test uphill as well? Before asking someone waiting for citizenship to explain checks and balances, might we establish whether the people operating the checks have ever met a balance?
The Daily Heckler: five or six selected stories.
Political satire for your morning inbox.
I am not proposing that every immigration file be approved by a golden retriever with a novelty stamp. Eligibility matters. Vetting matters. There are perfectly legitimate reasons an individual application might take time.
But when approvals fall from more than 230,000 to roughly 55,000 in comparable quarters, the government owes people something more illuminating than an announcement that it is being very, very careful. A restaurant that serves one-quarter as many dinners cannot settle every complaint by pointing proudly at the hand-washing poster.
What changed? Where is the work backing up? What demonstrates that the extra wait is producing a better decision rather than merely a later one?
The agency’s answer includes the reminder that naturalization is a privilege, not a right.
Right. Sit down. Be grateful. Your aspiration has been received and placed beneath the small brass paperweight marked we could always take longer.
And then—because apparently this needed another layer—the election still happens on schedule. Whatever an applicant’s politics, a delayed citizenship decision can mean missing the chance to vote. The ballot does not remain open until the paperwork has finished expressing its seriousness.
I’m tired. These are people trying to complete the process the government itself established, not contestants attempting to sneak into America through the bonus round.
If the rules need changing, explain them. If the agency needs time, account for it. But stop presenting an increasingly immobile legal pathway as proof that the pathway is working beautifully.
You cannot spend years shouting use the front door and then claim a functioning country is one where nobody can find the fucking doorknob.


Comments
Have something to say? Give this story a heckle.
Comment Rules
Argue the point. Add a joke. No threats, harassment, hate speech, spam, private personal information or unsupported accusations. First-time comments and comments with links are moderated. Full Comment Rules
Loading comments…
Questions or deletion requests? Contact Us. We retain comments and moderation records until removed. Only hashed email identifiers are stored for comment accounts.