The Justice Department says FBI and ICE employees won't serve as midterm election monitors. In a court filing responding to an NAACP lawsuit, it said monitors will be unarmed, won't act as law enforcement, and have been trained not to interfere with voting or violate state and local rules.

Good. Clear limits. Those matter.

Employees from the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons will serve as monitors.

That is quite a way to finish the reassurance.

Don't worry, we won't send those agencies. We've assembled a gentler assortment from Drugs, Explosives and Prisons. Imagine the recruitment meeting: we need a calming presence, somebody whose employer immediately makes people think of a pleasant, uneventful Tuesday. Any suggestions? Yes, the prison bureau. Put them down.

These employees are supposed to observe and take notes, not enforce laws while monitoring. That's an actual restriction, not a secret wink authorizing arrests. The NAACP argues the staffing plan amounts to intimidation; that is its allegation, not a court finding.

But WHO WORKSHOPS THE REASSURANCE? Who gets to the end of Federal Bureau of Prisons and thinks, yes, that should settle everybody's nerves?

DOES THE CLIPBOARD HAVE A LITTLE CARD SAYING PLEASE DISREGARD MY DAY JOB?

The Daily Heckler: five or six selected stories.
Political satire for your morning inbox.

Fine. I'll sit down. Unarmed. Notes. No interference. Read the filing, breathe, let the safeguards mean something.

And then there's the narrower meaning of that first reassurance. No ICE monitors does not mean no ICE officers could be present for another purpose. The Hill reports that Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said in September they could respond to a threat or serve a warrant on someone already being tracked. Denver sued over those remarks.

That's not a report of officers actually arriving or arresting anybody. It is a rather important limit on what the comforting headline promises.

So now I have to inspect the word MONITOR like it's a load-bearing wall. Don't lean on the reassurance! That noun is holding up the whole fucking house!

Imagine putting the reassuring announcement on a sign outside a polling place. No ICE monitors. Excellent. Then needing a second sign explaining the other capacities in which an officer might be present, and a third sign explaining that the first sign was never about the second sign.

CAN WE GET AN I READ THE FOOTNOTES STICKER WITH THE I VOTED ONE?

The administration says stricter oversight is needed for public confidence. My confidence would appreciate a promise that doesn't arrive with its own receptionist asking which department of reassurance I meant.