The word “owner” is doing two jobs in Amanda Smith's case. One gets her into trouble. The other keeps her out of her account information. It is an impressively versatile security feature.
According to 404 Media, investigators connected Smith to a Cash App account used in a $1,000 Facebook Marketplace scam through identifying information including her Social Security number and date of birth. Smith says she never used Cash App and that someone stole her identity. She faces criminal charges; the case has not been resolved.
When she asked Cash App about the account, she says the company refused to provide information because she could not prove she owned it.
Ownership: sufficiently established to pursue the person, insufficiently established to assist her.
A company protecting account information from strangers is sensible. The complication is that this particular stranger was being prosecuted as the customer.
Smith eventually obtained the account data through discovery in the criminal case. Customer service had acquired an unusual prerequisite: a defense lawyer.
The Daily Heckler: five or six selected stories.
Political satire for your morning inbox.
The data, 404 Media reports, contains mismatches. The address was not one Smith or her husband had lived at. Network information pointed to Verizon; Smith says she uses AT&T and never had a Verizon plan. Those details do not resolve the case by themselves. They do suggest that identifying the person whose information appears on an account and identifying the person operating it are separate tasks. The second one is inconveniently the task the case requires.
Smith's private investigator raised that distinction with the publication. Her lawyer is seeking dismissal. Cash App and the prosecutor did not respond to its requests for comment.
Meanwhile, Smith described three nights in jail and a trip from Pennsylvania to Arkansas for court. An uncertain connection in a database can require a very definite person to travel. The software does not have to arrange a ride home.
Authorities offered a plea deal including a fine, restitution and probation, 404 Media reports. Smith says she refuses because she is innocent.
The account sent the $1,000 onward in small chunks within hours, according to the data reviewed by 404 Media. Smith's next hearing is scheduled for November. At least one part of this system still believes in instant transfers.


Comments
Have something to say? Give this story a heckle.
Comment Rules
Argue the point. Add a joke. No threats, harassment, hate speech, spam, private personal information or unsupported accusations. First-time comments and comments with links are moderated. Full Comment Rules
Loading comments…
Questions or deletion requests? Contact Us. We retain comments and moderation records until removed. Only hashed email identifiers are stored for comment accounts.